Opinion
No. CIV-18-951-C
09-24-2019
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Mitchell entered a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on July 23, 2019, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.
The facts and law are accurately set out in Judge Mitchell's Report and Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his Objection, Petitioner generally restates his previous arguments, misapplies the legal precedent he argues, and simply disagrees, without legal or factual foundation, with the conclusions contained in the R&R. To the contrary, the R&R accurately states the facts and the law, and even after consideration of Petitioner's objections, is the only conclusion permitted here.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, denies this petition for habeas corpus relief. A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of September, 2019.
/s/_________
ROBIN J. CAUTHRON
United States District Judge