From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahn v. Cellco Partnership

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Oct 24, 2011
C-1-10-118 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

C-1-10-118.

October 24, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 24) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 24) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Defendant's Motion to Disqualify Counsel (doc. no. 20) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's request for outside counsel to cross-examine Ms. Wiles during trial is DENIED. This case is STAYED for an additional sixty (60) days to permit the plaintiff to retain new counsel.

This case is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings according to law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kahn v. Cellco Partnership

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Oct 24, 2011
C-1-10-118 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Kahn v. Cellco Partnership

Case Details

Full title:FAISAL KAHN, Plaintiff v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

C-1-10-118 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 24, 2011)

Citing Cases

Seaman Corp. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

The Sixth Circuit "looks to the codified Rules of Professional Conduct for guidance in determining whether an…