From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kadlecek v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Oct 1, 2008
No. 09-08-091 CR (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2008)

Opinion

No. 09-08-091 CR

Opinion Delivered October 1, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH

On Appeal from the 9th District Court Montgomery County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 07-05-05673-CR.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On June 23, 2008, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Kadlecek v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Oct 1, 2008
No. 09-08-091 CR (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Kadlecek v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN JOHN KADLECEK, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Oct 1, 2008

Citations

No. 09-08-091 CR (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2008)