From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaczmar v. SharpSpring, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
21-CV-6227 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-6227 (ALC)

08-30-2021

DON KACZMAR, Plaintiff, v. SHARPSPRING, INC., ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE:

On August 23, 2021, Defendant SharpSpring, Inc. (hereinafter, “Defendant”), submitted a letter requesting a pre-motion conference to discuss their anticipated motion to dismiss. ECF No. 7. In accordance with this Court's Individual Practices, Plaintiff is required to “submit a letter, [] not to exceed 3 pages, setting forth its position within 3 business days from the service of the moving party's letter.” Individual Practices of Andrew L. Carter, Jr., 2.A.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendant's letter by no later than September 1, 2021.

Plaintiff's response was due on August 26, 2021 in accordance with this Court's Individual Practices; however, the Court hereby grants Plaintiff an extension until September 1, 2021 to submit a response.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kaczmar v. SharpSpring, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
21-CV-6227 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Kaczmar v. SharpSpring, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DON KACZMAR, Plaintiff, v. SHARPSPRING, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

21-CV-6227 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)