From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Juste v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Mar 31, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16CV21 (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:16CV21

03-31-2016

ANDRE JUSTE, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on February 10, 2016, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiff's conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

M. Hannah Lauck

United States District Judge Date: MAR 31 2016
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Juste v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Mar 31, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16CV21 (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2016)
Case details for

Juste v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE JUSTE, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:16CV21 (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2016)

Citing Cases

Juste v. Martinez

ve Defendants within South Carolina's jurisdiction or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.…