From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jupiter v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 24, 1961
287 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 18622.

February 24, 1961.

Julian B. Humphrey, David C. Treen, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Francis G. Weller, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., M. Hepburn Many, U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and CLAYTON, District Judge.


This appeal in a federal tort claims action presents only issues of fact. The record discloses that there was ample evidence to support the finding of the trial court that the appellant Jupiter was guilty of contributory negligence and that such contributory negligence continued to the occurrence of the mishap which produced the injury from which he suffered. See Jupiter v. United States, D.C., 181 F. Supp. 294.

Although the strict application of the contributory negligence doctrine works a hardship on tort claim litigants in Alabama in contrast to other states where the rule of comparative negligence applies, we are bound to apply the law of the place of injury in such a case.

The judgment must be affirmed.


Summaries of

Jupiter v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 24, 1961
287 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Jupiter v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Ervin JUPITER and Edward Levy Metals, Inc., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 1961

Citations

287 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Butler

She, and not McKinley, had the last chance to prevent the tragedy. See Maryland Casualty Co. v. Allstate…

Dinkelman v. United States

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW          In a Federal Tort Claims Act the United States District Court applies the law of…