Jung v. Marshal

Full title: DALE JUNG, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHAL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 26, 2011

10-1732-AHM (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)

Opinion

DALE JUNG, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHAL, Warden, Respondent. No. 10-1732-AHM (JEM) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 26, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.