From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jules v. Cosmetic & Reconstruction Dentistry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 9, 2020
19 CIVIL 5008 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 5008 (VEC)

03-09-2020

EVITA JULES, Plaintiff, v. COSMETIC AND RECONSTRUCTION DENTISTRY, DR. MICHAEL CHESNER D.D.S., AND DR. ROBERT B. VOGEL, D.D.S., PLLC, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 6, 2020, the R&R is ADOPTED in full. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Because the R&R gave the parties adequate warning, see R&R, Dkt. 23 at 1112, Plaintiff's failure to file adequate and specific objections to the R&R precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga Cty., 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008); Mario, 313 F.3d at 766. Accordingly, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, permission to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of appeal is denied; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 9, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Jules v. Cosmetic & Reconstruction Dentistry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 9, 2020
19 CIVIL 5008 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Jules v. Cosmetic & Reconstruction Dentistry

Case Details

Full title:EVITA JULES, Plaintiff, v. COSMETIC AND RECONSTRUCTION DENTISTRY, DR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 9, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 5008 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)