From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Juice v. Ferguson

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 1, 2016
No. 72 MM 2016 (Pa. Aug. 1, 2016)

Opinion

No. 72 MM 2016

08-01-2016

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL: STEPHEN JUICE, Petitioner v. TAMMY FERGUSON, AS FACILITY MGR. SCI BENNER AND KURT LYNOTT ESQ., AS APPOINTED COUNSEL; AND HONORABLE MICHAEL BARRASSE, Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Motion to Recuse, the Motion for Leave to File a Reply, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Juice v. Ferguson

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 1, 2016
No. 72 MM 2016 (Pa. Aug. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Juice v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL: STEPHEN JUICE, Petitioner v. TAMMY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 1, 2016

Citations

No. 72 MM 2016 (Pa. Aug. 1, 2016)