From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Judkins v. Geovera Holdings, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-03366-WBS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-03366-WBS-JFM

02-27-2013

JAMES JUDKINS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GEOVERA HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-20, Defendants.

RONALD F. GARRITY, BAR NO. 110488 SARAH E. LUCAS, BAR NO. 148713 SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendant GeoVera Holdings, Inc.


RONALD F. GARRITY, BAR NO. 110488
SARAH E. LUCAS, BAR NO. 148713
SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI
Professional Corporation
Attorneys for Defendant
GeoVera Holdings, Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE


STIPULATION

WHEREAS, Plaintiff James Judkins ("Plaintiff") filed this action against Defendant GeoVera Holdings, Inc. ("Defendant") alleging claims for: (1) Disability Discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, ("ADA"), (2) Retaliation in violation of the ADA, (3) Disability Discrimination in violation of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"), (4) Failure to Accommodate in violation of the FEHA, (5) Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process in violation of the FEHA, and (6) Retaliation in violation of the FEHA and the Family Medical leave Act ("FMLA");

WHEREAS, on January 29, 2013, both Parties and their respective counsel of record participated in a mediation session with Retired Judge Richard Silver and thereafter continued to discuss settlement, including an full-day settlement meeting between the Parties and their counsel on February 19, 2013; and

WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a written settlement agreement, by which Plaintiff releases all claims and causes of action against Defendant, including the claims asserted by him in this Action for Disability Discrimination in violation of the ADA, Retaliation in violation of the ADA, Disability Discrimination in violation of the FEHA, Failure to Accommodate in violation of the FEHA, Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process in violation of the FEHA, and Retaliation in violation of the FEHA and the FMLA.

THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT HEREBY STIPULATE, by and through their respective counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), to to dismiss the above-captioned matter with prejudice. This stipulation and dismissal completely terminates the above-entitled action against all parties. Each party will bear its/his own attorneys' fees and costs.

The parties hereto also request that this court retain jurisdiction in order to enforce the terms and conditions of the settlement and release.

Respectfully submitted,

SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI

Professional Corporation

By: ____________________

RONALD F. GARRITY, ESQ.

SARAH E. LUCAS, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant

GeoVera Holdings, Inc.

SMITH PATTEN

By: _______________

SPENCER SMITH, ESQ.

DOW PATTEN, ESQ.

Attorneys for Plaintiff James Judkins

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

The release by Plaintiff of all claims and potential claims he has or may have against Defendant for violation of Plaintiff's rights under the statutes referenced above is hereby APPROVED; and

IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

____________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Judkins v. Geovera Holdings, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-03366-WBS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Judkins v. Geovera Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES JUDKINS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GEOVERA HOLDINGS, INC., a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-03366-WBS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)