JUDD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Full title: DAVID JUDD, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 2, 2010

Civil Action 2:09-cv-00283 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:09-cv-00283.

September 2, 2010

ORDER

GREGORY FROST, District Judge

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the August 10, 2010 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. #41.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court remand the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advises parties that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a "waiver of the right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." (Doc. # 41, at 22.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Defendant failed to object to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court REMANDS the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.