From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Juarez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 7, 2013
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00748-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00748-KJN

01-07-2013

ROSIE GRIJALVA JUAREZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Bess M. Brewer, Attorney for Plaintiff [as authorized by email] BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration DAVID LERCH Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT, IL SBN 6191786
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
DAVID LERCH, CSBN 229411
Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8936

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: David.Lerch@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTLING

ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO THE

EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28

U.S.C. § 2412(d)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($4,750). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be made directly to Bess Brewer, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees, expenses and costs, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses and costs in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted,

______________

Bess M. Brewer,

Attorney for Plaintiff

[as authorized by email]

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

By: _________________

DAVID LERCH

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:

____________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Juarez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 7, 2013
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00748-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Juarez v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ROSIE GRIJALVA JUAREZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 7, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00748-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)