From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.R. v. San Marcos Unified Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Nov 9, 2021
21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS)

11-09-2021

J.R., by and through her Guardians ad Litem NICOLE REED and RONALD REED, Plaintiff, v. SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


ORDER REQUESTING DEFENDANT FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

Presently before the Court is the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff J.R., by and through her Guardians ad Litem Nicole Reed and Ronald Reed (ECF No. 9). In light of the arguments Plaintiff advances in her Reply (ECF No. 17), the Court finds that supplemental briefing is necessary to adjudicate the Motion. Accordingly, Defendant SHALL FILE a sur-reply on or before November 11, 2021. Defendant's brief, not including any exhibits necessary to respond to the Court's Order, SHALL NOT exceed ten (10) pages in length. The sur-reply shall address (1) whether Plaintiff has adequately exhausted her claims, (2) whether requiring Plaintiff to leave the classroom to receive insulin is consistent with the stay put, and (3) whether the assistant has additional duties outside of monitoring Plaintiff, and if so, whether that is consistent with the stay put.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

J.R. v. San Marcos Unified Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Nov 9, 2021
21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2021)
Case details for

J.R. v. San Marcos Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:J.R., by and through her Guardians ad Litem NICOLE REED and RONALD REED…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Nov 9, 2021

Citations

21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2021)