From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.R. v. San Marcos Unified Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 29, 2021
21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS)

10-29-2021

J.R., by and through her Guardians ad Litem NICOLE REED and RONALD REED, Plaintiff, v. SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge

Presently before the Court is the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff J.R., by and through her Guardians ad Litem, Nicole Reed and Ronald Reed (“Mot., ” ECF No. 9). Plaintiff requests that “Defendant should be ordered to immediately provide J.R. with her individual, one-to-one health and nursing services-specialized physical health care services for seven hours per day[.]” Id. at 11. Defendant has filed an opposition to the Motion and states that the “District has agreed to provide the one-to-one health and nursing services for [seven hours] per day, so this issue is moot.” ECF No. 13 at 12.

In light of Defendant's representation that it has offered to provide Plaintiff with the services Plaintiff requests in her Motion, the Parties SHALL promptly meet and confer to resolve whether the Motion for Preliminary Injunction is moot. If the Parties cannot agree that the Motion is mooted, Plaintiff must clearly articulate in her Reply what Defendant is not providing Plaintiff and what issues remain before the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

J.R. v. San Marcos Unified Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 29, 2021
21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2021)
Case details for

J.R. v. San Marcos Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:J.R., by and through her Guardians ad Litem NICOLE REED and RONALD REED…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Oct 29, 2021

Citations

21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2021)