From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jpmorgan Chase Bank v. Saticoy Bay LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 14, 2017
No. 69583 (Nev. Apr. 14, 2017)

Opinion

No. 69583

04-14-2017

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, THE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST FROM THE FDIC AS RECEIVER OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Appellant, v. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 10013 ALEGRIA, Respondent.


ORDER VACATING AND REMANDING

This is an appeal from a district court summary judgment in a judicial foreclosure and quiet title action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; James Crockett, Judge.

In granting summary judgment, the district court determined that the recitals in respondent's deed were conclusive proof that the HOA foreclosure sale extinguished appellant's deed of trust. That determination is inconsistent with our opinion in Shadow Wood Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. New York Community Bancorp, Inc., 132 Nev., Adv. Op. 5, 366 P.3d 1105, 1112-16 (2016), which held that courts retain equitable authority to set aside a foreclosure sale when the sale is affected by "fraud, unfairness, or oppression." Accordingly, we conclude that summary judgment may have been improper. Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 729, 121 P.3d 1026, 1029 (2005) (reviewing de novo a district court's summary judgment and recognizing that summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issues of material fact remain). On remand, the district court should consider appellant's request for an NRCP 56(f) continuance in light of Shadow Wood. We therefore

We disagree with respondent's contention that the record contains evidence establishing that the HOA complied with all of the statutory foreclosure requirements.

ORDER the judgment of the district court VACATED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

In light of our opinion in Saticoy Bay LLC Series 350 Durango 104 v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 5, 388 P.3d 970 (2017), appellant's due process and takings arguments lack merit. We further note that, as this court observed in SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., NRS 116.31168 (2013) incorporates NRS 107.090 (2013), which required that notices be sent to a deed of trust beneficiary. 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 75, 334 P.3d 408, 418 (2014); id. at 422 (Gibbons, C.J., dissenting); see also Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 832 F.3d 1154, 1163-64 (9th Cir. 2016) (Wallace, J., dissenting).

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre

/s/_________, J.

Stiglich cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge

Eleissa C. Lavelle, Settlement Judge

Snell & Wilmer LLP/Salt Lake City

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Tucson

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas

Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Jpmorgan Chase Bank v. Saticoy Bay LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 14, 2017
No. 69583 (Nev. Apr. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Jpmorgan Chase Bank v. Saticoy Bay LLC

Case Details

Full title:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, THE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST FROM…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 14, 2017

Citations

No. 69583 (Nev. Apr. 14, 2017)