From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyce v. Butler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-07530 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 18, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-07530

11-18-2014

DEBORAH L. JOYCE, Petitioner, v. SANDRA BUTLER, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court are Petitioner Deborah Joyce's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ("§ 2241 petition") [ECF 1] and Respondent's motion to dismiss [ECF 7]. By Standing Order entered April 8, 2013, and filed in this case on February 6, 2014, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation for disposition (PF&R). On June 10, 2014, Magistrate Judge Eifert issued a PF&R [ECF 10] recommending that the Court deny § 2241 petition and grant the motion to dismiss.

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). In addition, this Court need not conduct a de novo review when a party "makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the Court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). Objections to the June 10, 2014, PF&R in this case were due by June 27, 2014. To date, no objections have been filed.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R [ECF 10], DENIES Petitioner's § 2241 petition [ECF 1], GRANTS Respondent's motion to dismiss [ECF 7], and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: November 18, 2014

/s/_________

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Joyce v. Butler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-07530 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Joyce v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH L. JOYCE, Petitioner, v. SANDRA BUTLER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 18, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-07530 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 18, 2014)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Barnes

Petitioner cannot meet either the Jones or Wheeler tests because each require “subsequent to a § 2255 motion”…