From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jourdain v. Service Employees Int. Union Local 1199

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 1, 2010
09 Civ. 1942 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2010)

Opinion

09 Civ. 1942 (AKH).

April 1, 2010


ORDER VACATING NOTICES OF DEPOSITIONS AND GRANTING PROTECTIVE ORDER


Plaintiff Geronimo Jourdain, proceeding pro se, was previously employed by Defendant New York Presbyterian Hospital and was a member of Defendant Service Employees International Union Local 1199 (hereinafter, "Local 1199"). Plaintiff alleges that his employment was wrongfully terminated and that Defendants are liable for employment discrimination, constitutional and human rights violations, and federal labor law violations. Plaintiff has served notices of depositions on the Defendants. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's notices of depositions are vacated and a protective order is granted.

On March 10, 2010, Local 1199 moved to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Local 1199 also moved under Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a protective order to prevent Plaintiff from deposing union employees pending resolution of its motion to dismiss. On March 22, 2010, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff opposing Local 1199's motion for a protective order and requesting additional time to conduct the depositions.

A district court possesses broad authority to regulate discovery proceedings. Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n, 622 F.2d 34, 35-36 (2d Cir. 1980); Ass'n Fe Y Allegria v. The Republic of Ecuador, 98 Civ. 8650 (BSJ), 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4815, 1999 WL 147716, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. March 16, 1999). A district court may, "for good cause, issue an order to protect a party . . . from . . . undue burden or expense." Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(1). Local 1199's motion appears to have merit and resolution of that motion may eliminate the need to conduct any depositions. See Robertson, 622 F.2d at 35-36. Accordingly, I grant a protective order in favor of both Defendants to protect them from "undue burden or expense." Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(1).

Plaintiff's notices of depositions are vacated with respect to both Defendants pending resolution of Local 1199's motion. Plaintiff may renew his notices of deposition if Local 1199 does not prevail on its pending motion.

The Clerk shall mark the motion (Doc. No. 22) as terminated.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jourdain v. Service Employees Int. Union Local 1199

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 1, 2010
09 Civ. 1942 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Jourdain v. Service Employees Int. Union Local 1199

Case Details

Full title:GERONIMO JOURDAIN, Plaintiff, v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 1, 2010

Citations

09 Civ. 1942 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2010)