From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Josephine Cnty. v. Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Oct 23, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-00566-CL (D. Or. Oct. 23, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-00566-CL

10-23-2018

JOSEPHINE COUNTY, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF OREGON and ATTORNEY GENERAL ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 18), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) is adopted. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2018.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Josephine Cnty. v. Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Oct 23, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-00566-CL (D. Or. Oct. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Josephine Cnty. v. Oregon

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE COUNTY, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF OREGON and ATTORNEY GENERAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Oct 23, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-00566-CL (D. Or. Oct. 23, 2018)