From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
No. 2:12-CV-1935-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-CV-1935-CMK-P

02-28-2013

ALONZO JOSEPH, Plaintiff, v. C. SMITH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's document entitled "Motion to Amend These Exhibits" (Doc. 10). In his motion, plaintiff seeks leave to submit additional exhibits in support of his motion for appointment of counsel. Because plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel has been denied, the instant request is now moot.

To the extent the court may not have considered the documentation attached to the current motion when it considered plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, the court has re-examined both the motion and the exhibits and does not find that reconsideration of the order denying appointment of counsel is warranted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 10) is denied.

_______________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Joseph v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
No. 2:12-CV-1935-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Joseph v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO JOSEPH, Plaintiff, v. C. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-CV-1935-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)