From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Giacalone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1996
224 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 5, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion is denied.

We agree with the defendant judgment debtor that the proceeds of the check in dispute are exempt from garnishment or levy pursuant to Federal law (see, 5 U.S.C. § 8346 [a]; Matter of Dickerson, 168 Misc. 54; Waggoner v. Game Sales Co., 702 S.W.2d 808 [Ark]; see also, Surace v. Danna, 248 N.Y. 18; Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Harris, 854 P.2d 921 [Okla]). Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Joseph v. Giacalone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1996
224 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Joseph v. Giacalone

Case Details

Full title:ALAN H. JOSEPH, Respondent, v. JOSEPH GIACALONE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 771

Citing Cases

State, ex Rel., Nixon v. McClure

Id. at 87. More recently, in Joseph v. Giacalone, 637 N.Y.S.2d 771, 772 (N.Y. A.D. 1996), a New York court…

In re Hunt

New York State Courts have consistently followed Surace in allowing judgment debtors to claim exemptions in…