From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph Nabbore v. Jason Schneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2009
62 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-02222.

May 12, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated January 29, 2008, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

John J. Guadagno, East Islip, N.Y. (Joseph R. D'Addario of counsel), for appellant.

Neil L. Kanzer, Garden City, N.Y. (Lorraine M. Korth of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the defendant driver's deposition testimony that the accident occurred when the defendant driver exited a driveway and made a left turn across the plaintiffs lane of travel in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1143 ( cf. Ferrara v Castro, 283 AD2d 392, 392-393; Yasinosky v Lenio, 28 AD3d 652, 653). In opposition, however, the defendants raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant driver's negligence, if any, was a substantial factor in causing the accident ( cf. Gerdvil v Tarnowski, 43 AD3d 995, 995-996). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.


Summaries of

Joseph Nabbore v. Jason Schneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2009
62 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Joseph Nabbore v. Jason Schneider

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH NABBORE, Appellant, v. JASON SCHNEIDER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3878
877 N.Y.S.2d 902

Citing Cases

Young v. Serino

The plaintiff has therefore established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law as to the…

Schwartz v. Nagori

The plaintiff failed to demonstrate that there was no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences…