From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph E. G. v. East Irondequoit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 16, 2000.

Appeal from Amended Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Amended order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motions and cross motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendants' motions and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The infant plaintiff, a member of the East Ridge High School wrestling team, developed herpes simplex I after participating in a wrestling meet at Victor High School involving teams from defendant school districts. Defendants Fairport Central School District and East Irondequoit Central School District failed to submit evidence in admissible form establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). The affidavits of their counsel, who have no personal knowledge of the facts, lack evidentiary value ( see, Wright v. Rite-Aid of N. Y., 249 A.D.2d 931; McGowan v. Villa Maria Coll., 185 A.D.2d 674; see also, Buffalo Retired Teachers 91-94 Alliance v. Buffalo Teachers Fedn., 251 A.D.2d 968), and uncertified, unsworn medical records are not in admissible form ( see, Butera v. Woodhouse, 267 A.D.2d 1039; Briggs v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 190 A.D.2d 1047, 1048-1049). Although the motion of defendant Victor Central School District was supported by evidence in admissible form, i.e., the affidavit of its wrestling coach, that affidavit does not address the allegation that defendant Victor Central School District was negligent in failing to clean the mats properly after a wrestler sustained a bloody nose. Thus, that defendant also failed to meet its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and the "[f]ailure to make such showing requires denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers" ( Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853).


Summaries of

Joseph E. G. v. East Irondequoit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Joseph E. G. v. East Irondequoit

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH E. G., JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND JOSEPH G. AND CHRISTINE G., AS HIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 537