From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jorgensen v. Hows Mkts.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 29, 2022
8:21-cv-00250-JLS-ADS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

8:21-cv-00250-JLS-ADS

06-29-2022

Frank Jorgensen et al v. Hows Markets, LLC et al


PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REQUIRING HOWS MARKETS LLC TO SHOW CAUSE, IN WRITING, WHY ITS PLEADINGS SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN

PRESENT: HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 22, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of HOWS Markets LLC's Incapacity to Sue or Defend. (Notice, Doc. 58.) In the Notice, Plaintiffs note that HOWS “lacks the capacity to sue or be sued in this action because its corporate powers have been suspended by the State of California.” (Id. at 1.) As support, Plaintiffs have attached a “copy of a California Business Search status report from the California Secretary of State's website showing that HOWS's corporate powers have been suspended.” (Id.) Under California law, “[a] corporation that has had its powers suspended ‘lacks the legal capacity to prosecute or defend a civil action during its suspension.'” City of San Diego v. San Diegans for Open Gov't, 3 Cal.App. 5th 568, 577 (2016), as modified on denial of reh'g (Oct. 17, 2016). A corporation that has had its powers suspended cannot, among on other things, have an answer filed on its behalf. Id. (“We do not understand why BLC would represent SDOG in the Validation Action and file a verified answer on behalf of SDOG when it knew, as did the corporation, that SDOG was suspended.”). In cases involving a suspended corporation, California courts have noted that an “appropriate remedy is to strike the corporation's pleadings and refuse to consider its defenses.” Cadle Co. v. World Wide Hosp. Furniture, Inc., 144 Cal.App.4th 504, 513 (2006). “Alternatively, the plaintiff may proceed with a default prove-up or, on the court's own motion or at the corporation's request, the proceedings may be briefly continued to permit the incapacitated entity to secure reinstatement.” Id.

Accordingly, HOWS is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, why this Court should not strike the pleadings and not consider any defenses as to HOWS in this action. HOWS is ordered to file its response within seven (7) days of this Order's issuance.


Summaries of

Jorgensen v. Hows Mkts.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 29, 2022
8:21-cv-00250-JLS-ADS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Jorgensen v. Hows Mkts.

Case Details

Full title:Frank Jorgensen et al v. Hows Markets, LLC et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

8:21-cv-00250-JLS-ADS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)