From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 9, 1990
561 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 87-03143.

May 9, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol M. Dittmar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence for unarmed robbery. We remand, however, for a correction of the written judgment to reflect unarmed robbery rather than armed robbery.

With respect to costs and restitution, the appellant affirmatively waived his right to a hearing on the costs assessed. At sentencing the trial judge intended to impose restitution to cover the loss according to the amount testified to by the store clerk, and the judge believed the amount to be fifty-five dollars. The restitution order should be amended to reflect fifty dollars instead of sixty dollars because the store clerk's testimony reflected that she gave the appellant "about $50 or more."

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jordan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 9, 1990
561 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Jordan v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREG LEON JORDAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 9, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Jefferson v. State

Although we are not aware of any decisions which have specifically addressed the issue at bar, we are aware…

Hamilton v. State

[I]n other contexts, defendants have been recognized as having the option to waive numerous substantive…