From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Madden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 19, 2024
5:22-cv-00473-HDV (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)

Opinion

5:22-cv-00473-HDV (SK)

07-19-2024

JOE ANTHONY JORDAN, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY HABEAS PETITION

HERNAN D. VERA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the filed Report and Recommendation to Deny Habeas Petition and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DENIED. Judgment will accordingly be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jordan v. Madden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 19, 2024
5:22-cv-00473-HDV (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Jordan v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:JOE ANTHONY JORDAN, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2024

Citations

5:22-cv-00473-HDV (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)