From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 6, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-3622 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-3622

03-06-2013

WILLIAM THOMAS JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND

REMANDING

This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on February 15, 2013 and has made a de novo determination of the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). No objections have been filed. This court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order and finds that remand is required for the Administrative Law Judge properly to assess the plaintiff's VA disability determinations. This court grants the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denies the defendant's motion to the extent of requiring a remand. This case is remanded to the Social Security Commission for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, adopted as the Memorandum and Opinion of this court.

SIGNED on March 6, 2013, at Houston, Texas.

______________________

Lee H. Rosenthal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jordan v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 6, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-3622 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Jordan v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM THOMAS JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-3622 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2013)