From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan-Bey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 3, 1990
787 S.W.2d 844 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 57323.

April 3, 1990.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY; DANIEL T. TILLMAN, JUDGE.

John A. Klosterman, Columbia, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., M. Melissa Manda Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.


ORDER


Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Jordan-Bey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 3, 1990
787 S.W.2d 844 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Jordan-Bey v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO JORDAN-BEY, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 3, 1990

Citations

787 S.W.2d 844 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)