From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jonton v. Fidelity Mortgage Investors

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 30, 1976
329 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. Z-242.

March 30, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Okaloosa County, Gillis E. Powell, J.

Clyde M. Taylor, Jr., Taylor, Brion, Buker Greene, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Walter J. Smith, Smith, Grimsley, Barron Remington, Ft. Walton Beach, for appellee.


This plenary appeal was taken from an order denying the judgment debtor's motion to set aside a sale carried out by the clerk pursuant to a final judgment of foreclosure. While we do not have jurisdiction of a plenary appeal from an order not final, we may and do entertain the case as an interlocutory appeal. Rules 3.2 and 4.2, F.A.R.; Rosen v. Hunter, 224 So.2d 371 (Fla.App. 3rd, 1969); Crepaldi v. Wagner, 128 So.2d 759 (Fla.App. 1st, 1961).

Appellant attacks the sale, admittedly conducted during hours prescribed by the court, because the clerk failed to delay until the imminent arrival of a prospective bidder arranged for by appellant. The judgment creditor successfully bid an amount less than the amount of the judgment. There is no evidence the clerk agreed to delay the sale or of any other circumstances invalidating the sale. We need not and do not anticipate the merits of any prospective application by appellee for a deficiency judgment, nor of appellant's potential defenses.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C.J., and COX, JOHN S., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Jonton v. Fidelity Mortgage Investors

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 30, 1976
329 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Jonton v. Fidelity Mortgage Investors

Case Details

Full title:JONTON, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. FIDELITY MORTGAGE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 30, 1976

Citations

329 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

In re Adoption of Scott

222 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1969).) Although filed as an appeal from a final order, it is in fact an interlocutory…