From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 2015
Case No. 1:14-cv-14 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-14

02-03-2015

MICHAEL JONES, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 16)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on January 2, 2015, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 16). No objections were filed.

As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly:

1. Petitioner's motion to dismiss the instant petition without prejudice (Doc. 15) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 2/3/15

s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jones v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 2015
Case No. 1:14-cv-14 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Jones v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JONES, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-14 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2015)