From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1138 LKK GGH HC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1138 LKK GGH HC

03-29-2013

RODNEY WAYNE JONES, Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA , et. al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 15, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 15, 2012, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is denied; and

3. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases.

______________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Jones v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1138 LKK GGH HC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Jones v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY WAYNE JONES, Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA , et. al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1138 LKK GGH HC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)