From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Clark

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 10, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-10-2017

In the Matter of the Claim of Cuudoes C. CLARK, Appellant. Commissioner of labor, Respondent.

Cuudoes C. Clark, Haverstraw, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Mary Hughes of counsel), for respondent.


Cuudoes C. Clark, Haverstraw, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Mary Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GARRY, J.P., LYNCH, DEVINE, MULVEY and RUMSEY, JJ.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 27, 2016, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as a customer service representative in the collections department of an automotive financing company after a confrontation with her supervisor. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, by decision filed May 27, 2016, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she engaged in disqualifying misconduct. Claimant appeals.

The record establishes that claimant's appeal was filed more than 30 days after the Board's decision was mailed. Accordingly, claimant's appeal is untimely and must be dismissed (see Labor Law § 624 ; Matter of Perrone [Commissioner of Labor], 66 A.D.3d 1091, 1091, 886 N.Y.S.2d 782 [2009] ). In any event, were we to reach the merits, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that claimant's conduct of engaging in protracted offensive conduct toward her supervisor, that included yelling, cursing and physical contact, amounted to insubordination (see Matter of Parker [Commissioner of Labor], 67 A.D.3d 1235, 1236, 889 N.Y.S.2d 712 [2009] ).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as untimely, without costs.

GARRY, J.P., LYNCH, DEVINE, MULVEY and RUMSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Clark

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 10, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Clark

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Cuudoes C. CLARK, Appellant. Commissioner of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 10, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
57 N.Y.S.3d 446

Citing Cases

Naher v. Comm'r of Lab.

Although the merits of the February 7, 2023 decision would ordinarily be reviewable upon this appeal because…

In re Naher

the record establishes that claimant did not take the appeal to this Court until more than 30 days after the…