Jones v. Unipres U.S.A., Inc.

Full title: FREDDIE G. JONES, Plaintiff, v. UNIPRES U.S.A., INC., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 6, 2012

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-01089 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-01089

12-06-2012

FREDDIE G. JONES, Plaintiff, v. UNIPRES U.S.A., INC., Defendant.

M. Clark Spoden James B. Johnson STITES & HARBISON, PLLC Attorneys for Defendant Unipres U.S.A., Inc.

TRAUGER

JUDGE TRAUGER

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BRYANT

JURY DEMAND

DEFENDANT UNIPRES, U.S.A., INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Defendant Unipres U.S.A., Inc., files this Motion to Dismiss and respectfully requests that it be granted because:

(1) Plaintiff's case is time barred because he filed this case more than 90 days after receiving his right-to-sue letter, and
(2) Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim for retaliation.

In support of its motion, Unipres files herewith its supporting Memorandum of Law.

______________

M. Clark Spoden

James B. Johnson

STITES & HARBISON, PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant Unipres U.S.A., Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 16th day of November, 2012, a true and exact copy of the foregoing has been served via ECF on Andy L. Allman, 103 Bluegrass Commons Boulevard, Hendersonville, Tennessee 37075.

M. Clark Spoden