Opinion
88292
03-29-2024
JOSEPH WAYNE JONES, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
ORDER DENYING PETITION
CADISH, C.J.
This pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks to have petitioner's Presentence Investigation Report amended. We are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004) (writ relief is proper only when there is not a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and the petitioner bears the burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted). Petitioner has not submitted an appendix with the materials essential to understanding the petition, see NRAP 21(a)(4), and has failed to show that he lacks a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Stiglich, J., Herndon, J.