From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Taylor

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 23, 2022
CV 21-4243-AB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-4243-AB (KS)

09-23-2022

SHAUN A. JONES, Plaintiff, v. D. TAYLOR, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ANDRE BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), all of the records herein, the July 25, 2022 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Dkt. No. 40), and Plaintiff's Objections to the Report (“Objections”) (Dkt. No. 45).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is GRANTED; (2) Plaintiff's free exercise claim is DISMISSED without leave to amend; (3) Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and (4) Defendant SHALL file an Answer to the FAC on the sole remaining claim (Claim 1: Excessive Use of Force) within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Taylor

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 23, 2022
CV 21-4243-AB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Jones v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:SHAUN A. JONES, Plaintiff, v. D. TAYLOR, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 23, 2022

Citations

CV 21-4243-AB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)