From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Sunoco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 5, 2017
170 A.3d 1026 (Pa. 2017)

Opinion

No. 141 EAL 2017

09-05-2017

James C. JONES and Frances T. Jones v. SUNOCO, INC. (R & M) f/k/a Sun Company, Inc., Safety–Kleen Systems, Inc., CRC Industries, Inc., 3M Company, Advances Auto Parts, Inc., The Pep Boys–Manny, Moe & Jack, Ace Hardward Corporation, Illinois Tool Works, Inc., d/b/a Permatex and d/b/a Gumout and d/b/a LPS Laboratories and d/b/a Wynn's, Kendall Refining Company, Ashland, Inc., Union Oil Company of California, Witco Distribution, Inc., Wal–Mart Stores, Inc., Hunt Refining Company, Hunt Oil Company, Rust–Oleum Corporation, individually and d/b/a Parks Corporation and Fuchs Lubricants, Inc. Petition of: Hunt Refining Company


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and the Uncontested Application for Stay of Review filed by Petitioner Hunt Refining Company are DENIED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Sunoco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 5, 2017
170 A.3d 1026 (Pa. 2017)
Case details for

Jones v. Sunoco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:James C. JONES and Frances T. Jones v. SUNOCO, INC. (R & M) f/k/a Sun…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Sep 5, 2017

Citations

170 A.3d 1026 (Pa. 2017)