From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Roszko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-3256 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-3256 MCE JFM (PC)

01-17-2013

ANTHONY R. JONES, Plaintiff, v. B. ROSZKO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Discovery will close in this case on February 2, 2013. (See Dkt. No. 40.) On January 2, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery. He seeks an order compelling defendants to give plaintiff "logs, dayly [sic] memorandum . . . and other reports." (See Dkt. No. 43 at p. 1.) However, it does not appear that plaintiff has ever served such a request on the defendants. Plaintiff was previously instructed that "[d]iscovery requests shall be served by the party seeking the discovery on all parties to the action." (See Dkt. No. 40 at p. 5.) Plaintiff has failed to comply by serving his discovery request on the defendants.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 43.) is DENIED.

______________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Roszko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-3256 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Jones v. Roszko

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY R. JONES, Plaintiff, v. B. ROSZKO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-3256 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)