From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Riley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 28, 2021
319 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-3653

06-28-2021

Richard JONES and Precision Forestry Services, LLC, Petitioners, v. Charles RILEY, Respondent.

Samuel B. Spinner and Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent.


Samuel B. Spinner and Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DENIED . See Globe Newspaper Co. v. King , 658 So. 2d 518, 519 (Fla. 1995) (holding that certiorari jurisdiction exists in this context only to review whether the trial court has conformed with the procedural requirement under section 768.72, Florida Statutes, that there be a proffer or presentation of evidence to the trial court and "a determination that there is a reasonable evidentiary basis for recovery of punitive damages"); see also Watt v. Lo , 302 So. 3d 1021, 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (citing § 786.72, Fla. Stat. (2019)) (holding that express or affirmative findings are not required to amend a complaint to add punitive damages; requiring instead "that the claimant make the necessary showing based on evidence in the record or proffered by the claimant").

Osterhaus, Bilbrey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. Riley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 28, 2021
319 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Riley

Case Details

Full title:Richard JONES and Precision Forestry Services, LLC, Petitioners, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

319 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)