From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 17, 1947
182 P.2d 522 (Okla. 1947)

Opinion

No. 33111.

June 17, 1947.

(Syllabus.)

APPEAL AND ERROR — Order on motion to vacate appointment of receiver not reviewable on petition in error and transcript.

An order on a motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver is not a part of the record proper, and cannot be reviewed by this court on petition in error and transcript.

Appeal from District Court, Creek County; C.O. Beaver, Judge.

Action upon a contract by J.L. Randolph, C.R. Randolph, and A.B. Ice against Lillian E. Jones. From an order of the trial court refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver, defendant appeals. Dismissed.

Glenn O. Young, of Sapulpa, for plaintiff in error.

George H. Jennings and T.L. Blakemore, both of Sapulpa, for defendants in error.


This is an appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver. The appeal is by petition in error with transcript attached.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the alleged error in refusing to vacate the order appointing the receiver cannot be presented by transcript. The appeal must be dismissed. In First National Bank of McAlester v. McIntosh, 113 Okla. 15, 237 P. 460, we held:

"An order on a motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver is not a part of the record proper, and cannot be reviewed by this court on petition in error and transcript."

See, also, Security State Bank v. Malone, 129 Okla. 112, 263 P. 655.

Appeal dismissed.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 17, 1947
182 P.2d 522 (Okla. 1947)
Case details for

Jones v. Randolph

Case Details

Full title:JONES v. RANDOLPH et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 17, 1947

Citations

182 P.2d 522 (Okla. 1947)
182 P.2d 522