From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Principal Powers of the United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 17, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-312 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 17, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-312

11-17-2014

GEORGE A. JONES, Plaintiff, v. PRINCIPAL POWERS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT, Defendant.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS CASE BE: (1) BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND (2) TERMINATED ON THE DOCKET

Attached hereto is a NOTICE to the parties regarding objections to this Report and Recommendation.

This case is presently before the Court on pro se Plaintiff's complaint. Doc. 1. In filing the complaint, pro se Plaintiff failed to either pay the appropriate filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or apply for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On October 15, 2014, the Court directed pro se Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or apply to proceed in forma pauperis on or before October 29, 2014. Doc. 2. Plaintiff was then advised that his failure to pay the filing fee or apply to proceed in forma pauperis by the October 29th deadline could result in the dismissal of his complaint. Id. Although the Court afforded pro se Plaintiff additional time to comply with the Show Cause Order, to date, Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that: (1) that pro se Plaintiff's complaint (doc. 1) be DISMISSED for failure to satisfy the pending Show Cause Order and, also, his failure to prosecute; and (2) this case be TERMINATED on the Court's docket. The Clerk is ORDERED to mail a copy of this Report and Recommendation to Plaintiff at his address of record. Date: November 17, 2014

s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days because this Report and Recommendation is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), (E), or (F), and may be extended further by the Court on timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. As is made clear above, this period is likewise extended to SEVENTEEN days if service of the objections is made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), (E), or (F). Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 153-55 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).


Summaries of

Jones v. Principal Powers of the United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 17, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-312 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Jones v. Principal Powers of the United States

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE A. JONES, Plaintiff, v. PRINCIPAL POWERS OF THE UNITED STATES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Nov 17, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-312 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 17, 2014)