From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 1997
238 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 25, 1997

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant and the cross motion of plaintiff for summary judgment. Although the record establishes that plaintiff made misrepresentations on the policy application, defendant failed to establish "that it would have rejected the application if the information had been truthful" ( Cutrone v. American Gen. Life Ins. Co., 199 A.D.2d 1032, 1033). There is, therefore, a question of fact regarding the materiality of the misrepresentation ( see, Cutrone v. American Gen. Life Ins. Co., supra).

We have considered the parties' remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Jones v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 1997
238 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Jones v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:PAUL R. JONES, Appellant-Respondent, v. PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 565

Citing Cases

Philadelphia Indemy. v. Mendon Ponds Tennis

The record establishes that the Woottons, who are officers and shareholders of the Tennis Club, made…

Philadelphia Indemy. Ins. v. Mendon Ponds [4th Dept 1999

The record establishes that the Woottons, who are officers and shareholders of the Tennis Club, made…