From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Oceanside Police Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Nov 23, 2021
21cv1972-JAH (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2021)

Opinion

21cv1972-JAH (JLB)

11-23-2021

WAYNE ELIJAH JONES, INMATE #20902359, Plaintiff, v. OCEANSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A) AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO PREPAY FILING FEES REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(A)

HON. JOHN A. HOUSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Wayne Elijah Jones, incarcerated at the Vista Detention Facility in Vista, California, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and has instead filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.)

I. Motion to Proceed IFP

All parties instituting any civil action in a district court of the United States, except a petition for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402, and the action may proceed despite a failure to prepay the entire fee only if leave to proceed IFP is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). Section 1915(a)(2) requires prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP to submit a “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h) (defining a “prisoner” as “any person” who at the time of filing is “incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.”) From the certified trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (4). The institution collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month's income, in any month in which the account exceeds $10, and forwards those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the entire fee in monthly installments regardless of whether their action is ultimately dismissed. Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).

In addition to a $350 fee, civil litigants, other than those granted leave to proceed IFP, must pay an additional administrative fee of $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2020)).

Although Plaintiff has submitted a copy of his inmate account in support of his IFP Motion, it is filled out by him rather than jail authorities, and neither it nor the accompanying accounting is certified. (ECF No. 2 at 4-7.) The Motion to Proceed IFP fails to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) because it does not include a certified copy of his trust fund account statement or an “institutional equivalent” attesting as to his trust account activity and balances for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S. D. Cal. CivLR 3.2.b. Without this accounting, the Court is unable to fulfill its statutory duty to assess the appropriate amount of initial filing fee which may be required to further prosecute this case. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(b)(1). Plaintiffs IFP motion is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff to provide the required document.

II. Conclusion and Order

(1) Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the civil filing fee.

(2) Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which complies with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). The Clerk of the Court will provide Plaintiff with this Court's approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to timely prepay the civil filing fee or timely complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP the Court will enter a final judgment of dismissal.

Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by either prepaying the full $402 civil filing fee, or submitting a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP, his Complaint will be reviewed before service and may be dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), regardless of whether he pays the full filing fee at once or is granted IFP status. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see also Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.”)

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Oceanside Police Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Nov 23, 2021
21cv1972-JAH (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Oceanside Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE ELIJAH JONES, INMATE #20902359, Plaintiff, v. OCEANSIDE POLICE…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Nov 23, 2021

Citations

21cv1972-JAH (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2021)