From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Murphy Company

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 23, 2004
149 S.W.3d 903 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Nos. ED 84630, ED 84631.

November 23, 2004.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

Robert J. Keefe, Keefe Griffiths, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Charles L. Joley, Jon W. Spencer, Donovan, Rose, Nester Joley, P.C., Belleville, IL, for insurer.

Dana Ellison, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for additional party.

Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.


ORDER


Employer appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Jones v. Murphy Company

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 23, 2004
149 S.W.3d 903 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Jones v. Murphy Company

Case Details

Full title:Herman JONES, Claimant/Respondent, v. MURPHY COMPANY, Employer/Appellant…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 23, 2004

Citations

149 S.W.3d 903 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)