From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 25, 2014
Case No. C-3:13-cv-085 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 25, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. C-3:13-cv-085

03-25-2014

ROBERT L. JONES Petitioner, v. ERNIE MOORE, Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution Respondent.


Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING JONES'S OBJECTIONS (Doc. #15)

TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; OVERRULING JONES'S OBJECTIONS TO

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 19); ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUPPLEMENTAL

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Docs. #13 and 17) IN THEIR

ENTIRETY; DISMISSING JONES'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING ANY REQUESTED

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; CERTIFYING THAT ANY

APPEAL OF EITHER THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OR

THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WOULD

BE OBJECTIVELY FRIVOLOUS AND TERMINATING THIS CASE

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to pro se Petitioner Robert L. Jones's ("Jones's") Objections (doc. #15) to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz's Report and Recommendations (doc. #13) and Jones's Objections (doc. #19) to Magistrate Judge Merz's Supplemental Report and Recommendations (doc. #17). In both the Report and Recommendations and Supplemental Report and Recommendations, Magistrate Judge Merz recommends that Jones's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied with prejudice, that Jones be denied a certificate of appealability and that this Court certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous.

The Warden did not respond to Jones's Objections to the Report and Recommendations and the time has run and the Warden has not responded to Jones's Objections to the Supplemental Report and Recommendations. This matter is, therefore, ripe for decision.

As required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72(b), the District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Jones's Objections (doc. #15) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations and Jones's Objections (doc. #19) to the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendations are not well-taken, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations and Supplemental Report and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety.

Jones's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied with prejudice. Further, Jones is denied a certificate of appealability. In addition, any appeal of the denial of Jones's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus would be objectively frivolous. Finally, the captioned cause is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Twenty-Fifth Day of March, 2014.

__________

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Robert L. Jones at his last address of record


Summaries of

Jones v. Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 25, 2014
Case No. C-3:13-cv-085 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Jones v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. JONES Petitioner, v. ERNIE MOORE, Warden, Lebanon Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

Citations

Case No. C-3:13-cv-085 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 25, 2014)