From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Mass. Bay Transportation Authority

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jul 29, 1999
714 N.E.2d 342 (Mass. 1999)

Opinion

July 29, 1999.

Supreme Judicial, Carol S. Ball, J., Appeal from order of single justice.

Motion granted.

Mary M. Logalbo, William A. Mitchell, Jr., Jonathon P. Feltner, Boston, for Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.

Samuel Jones, pro se.


RESCRIPT.

Samuel Jones (petitioner) appeals from the denial of his petition, pursuant to G.L.c. 211, 3, for relief by a single justice of this court. He had sought review of a Superior Court judge's dismissal of his complaint as to the city of Boston, and of another judge's dismissal of his complaint as to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authorithy (MBTA).

"The extraordinary remedy provided by c. 211, 3, should be invoked only when appellate review is otherwise unavailable". Hahn v. Planning Bd. of Stoughton, 403 Mass. 332, 335, 529 N.E.2d 1334 (1998). The petitioner could have sought and obtained appellate review of the judges' actions. Moreover, the Superior Court docket entries reflect his filing of notices of appeal. As a result, we allow the motion of the MBTA to join in the motion of the city to dismiss the petitoner's appeal from the judgement of the single justice, and we allow that motion to dismiss.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Jones v. Mass. Bay Transportation Authority

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jul 29, 1999
714 N.E.2d 342 (Mass. 1999)
Case details for

Jones v. Mass. Bay Transportation Authority

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL JONES v. MASS. BAY TRANSP. AUTHORITY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Jul 29, 1999

Citations

714 N.E.2d 342 (Mass. 1999)
714 N.E.2d 342

Citing Cases

Doe v. Chapman

As the single justice correctly concluded, Doe had an adequate alternative remedy to the exercise of this…