From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Mack

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 3, 2020
CIV. ACT. 1:20-cv-0290-TFM-MU (S.D. Ala. Nov. 3, 2020)

Opinion

CIV. ACT. 1:20-cv-0290-TFM-MU

11-03-2020

LARYIE EARL JONES, Petitioner, v. JUEY HOSS MACK, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On October 1, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation which recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his state remedies. See Doc. 29. No objections were filed.

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. This petition is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of November, 2020.

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Mack

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 3, 2020
CIV. ACT. 1:20-cv-0290-TFM-MU (S.D. Ala. Nov. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Jones v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:LARYIE EARL JONES, Petitioner, v. JUEY HOSS MACK, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 3, 2020

Citations

CIV. ACT. 1:20-cv-0290-TFM-MU (S.D. Ala. Nov. 3, 2020)