From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Kalkstein

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jun 10, 2020
234 A.3d 1160 (Del. 2020)

Opinion

No. 543, 2019

06-10-2020

Matthew JONES, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Dr. David KALKSTEIN and Rockford Center, Defendants Below, Appellees.


ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties' briefs and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons set forth in, the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated November 21, 2019. Although we affirm the Superior Court's judgment as well as its imposition of a monetary sanction against the appellant, we decline the appellees' request to impose any additional sanction. Because the Superior Court dismissed the appellant's complaint under 10 Del. C. § 8803(b), service did not issue and the appellees were not required to answer the complaint or otherwise appear in the Superior Court. We conclude that the appellees' participation in this appeal does not, in and of itself, warrant the imposition of any additional sanction.

The court found that the appellant's affidavit submitted under 10 Del. C. § 8803(e) was misleading. Accordingly, the court held the appellant in contempt of court and imposed a $100.00 sanction.
--------

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Kalkstein

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jun 10, 2020
234 A.3d 1160 (Del. 2020)
Case details for

Jones v. Kalkstein

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW JONES, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. DR. DAVID KALKSTEIN and…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Jun 10, 2020

Citations

234 A.3d 1160 (Del. 2020)