Jones v. Jacquez

Full title: LONGENO JONES, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2011

CV 09-5038 GW (JCG) (C.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)

Opinion

LONGENO JONES, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 09-5038 GW (JCG) United States District Court, C.D. California. May 13, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

          GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record. Petitioner filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted;

         (2) judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

         (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on the parties.

         Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.