From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Inch

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 25, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1384 (2019)

Summary

holding that the state court's determination that the petitioner's Rule 3.850 motion premised on newly discovered evidence was not timely filed was entitled to deference and therefore, the motion was not "properly filed" to toll the statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Hatcher v. Sec'y., Dep't of Corr.

Opinion

No. 18–7661.

03-25-2019

Philip Walter JONES, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Jones v. Inch

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 25, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1384 (2019)

holding that the state court's determination that the petitioner's Rule 3.850 motion premised on newly discovered evidence was not timely filed was entitled to deference and therefore, the motion was not "properly filed" to toll the statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Hatcher v. Sec'y., Dep't of Corr.
Case details for

Jones v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:Philip Walter JONES, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Mar 25, 2019

Citations

139 S. Ct. 1384 (2019)
203 L. Ed. 2d 618

Citing Cases

Sutton v. Dixon

cert denied sub nom. Jones v. Inch, 139 S.Ct. 1384 (2019).…

Saatio v. Sec'y Dep't of Corr.

Jones v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., 906 F.3d 1339, 1351 (11th Cir. 2018), cert. denied sub nom. Jones v.…