Jones v. Hartley

Full title: HARRY EUGENE JONES, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Dec 29, 2010

CV 09-6785 DMG (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2010)

Opinion

HARRY EUGENE JONES, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 09-6785 DMG (FFM). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. December 29, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: (1) respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice as time-barred.