From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Harcey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 13, 2012
Civil No. 11-616 (MJD/AJB) (D. Minn. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-616 (MJD/AJB)

07-13-2012

K.R. Jones, Plaintiff, v. T. Harcey, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's objection to the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated February 9, 2012. The Plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that the Defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment be granted and that this action be dismissed with prejudice.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 16] is GRANTED; and
2. This action is dismissed with prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

_______________

Michael J. Davis

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Jones v. Harcey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 13, 2012
Civil No. 11-616 (MJD/AJB) (D. Minn. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. Harcey

Case Details

Full title:K.R. Jones, Plaintiff, v. T. Harcey, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-616 (MJD/AJB) (D. Minn. Jul. 13, 2012)